The 50 cent solution:
Solving the "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy
Aref Assaf
September, 16, 2010
First published in
NJ.Voices. Join the online discussion.
I just returned from a television
interview, the topic of which was again the so-called
"Ground Zero Mosque." It was not the best of interviews and
I left unsure that I had conveyed my position.
I was
pressed on the need to compromise, “to show magnanimity
towards the 70% of Americans who don’t want the mosque so
near Ground Zero.”
My
views on the matter are well known.
I
am
against
relocating the planned cultural center, now known as Park51,
away from the “hallowed ground” of 9/11. Moving it is an
acceptance of the
guilt-by association
accusations that have
been levied against American Muslims, the Imam leading the
effort, and Islam. I have argued that moving the mosque is
akin to accepting second class citizenship. I have also
argued that only after Islam and American Muslims are
absolved of liability for the 9/11 attacks may a discussion
about alternate sites take place. And I have argued that
America’s anger should be aimed at Al-Qaeda, five thousand
miles away from our shores.
Opponents
of Park51 accuse me of being insensitive to the families of
9/11 victims. Of course, they are wrong, for I am immensely
sensitive to their feelings. Am I not a fellow citizen who
also mourned the loss of friends and business associates who
perished in the rubble of the World Trade Center? I share
the same feelings of those who feel that those symbols of
ours were violated. I share the same feelings that our
country’s pride has been irreversibly altered. But I am also
sensitive to the feelings of fellow Muslim victims the rest
of America refuses to acknowledge. It’s as if they never
existed; never suffered; never died. I am sensitive to the
feelings of millions of American Muslims who feel estranged,
outcast, and endlessly held in suspicion of their allegiance
to America. I am sensitive to our Bill of Rights and our
Constitution which does not exempt me from the right to
practice my faith. I am attuned to all these concerns and I
ask that you take my word for it.
But
I am being asked to “compromise” as evidence of my humanity
and also of my good American citizenship so that America can
be saved from the curse of Islamophobia. I am being asked to
forsake my right of equal protection under the law and
practice thereof so that America’s grieving can be
shortened, its anger mellowed, its insecurity overcome. I,
the victim of American xenophobia, one who truly believes he
is not guilty of causing or conspiring to bring such a
horrific attack on our nation’s soil - I am being told that
my patriotism hinges on my readiness to forsake being lumped
with foreign terrorists who not hijacked not only planes,
but also my faith - to commit an unspeakable crime. Alas,
these feeling were so yesterday.
I
am now willing to reconsider my position and actually
entertain a compromise. Here is a rough outline of my
proposal. Let’s move the Park51 center to Union City, New
Jersey, across the Hudson River. The natural geographic
divide should ensure the sanctity of Ground Zero is
maintained. I am sure the honorable message of Park 51, of
building bridges between the faiths, can be disseminated
regardless of where it is based. I am sure Muslims near
Ground Zero will still find a place in which to worship.
The
appropriate mechanism to apply for the relocation is what is
commonly known as
Eminent Domain.
Such a power of the state is generally utilized to condemn
buildings or other structures under the pretence of serving
the public good. A negotiated price is offered to the owner
of the condemned property.
We all read
about the “Slumlord of Union City”, namely Imam Feisal Abdul
Rauf, who is the leading figure behind the Park51 project.
New Jersey’s two leading newspapers papers,
The Star Ledger
and the
The Bergen Record,
have but convinced us that the Imam is the State’s worst
landlord, endangering the safety of his tenants with his
utter and consistent indifference to their needs. I won’t
get into what prevents the tenants from moving out if their
landlord habitually refuses to make needed repairs. Other
pundits have.
So America,
or at least those who oppose the proximity of a mosque near
Ground Zero, should demand the State of New Jersey to
condemn the debilitated apartment complex Imam Rauf owns in
Union City and in its stead build his cultural center and
mosque. We should expect little opposition from either the
mayor of Union City or the Chris Christie, the Governor of
New Jersey. Thousands of jobs would be created.
But just as with all properties condemned under
pretenses involving the public benefit, I would expect the
opponents of the mosque to each contribute $0.50 towards the
$100 million projected to build the cultural center. (My
math tells me that 70% of America equals about 200 million
citizens who are against the “Ground Zero mosque”). By
proposing this solution, I hope America will finally accept
the totality of my being including my Muslim faith.
Conversely, if they accept my suggestion, they will have
erased any doubt I may have that they truly are not against
Islam; only against a lone mosque in NYC.
I think
both the Imam should seriously consider my proposal. The
Imam could end up with a stash of cash for having his
apartments condemned by the State. Moreover, by having
American citizens foot the bill, we won’t have to worry
about the funding sources for the project.
And since it will properly cost less for the land and
building of the project in New Jersey, I am sure we will
have enough money left to build an apartment complex to
house the displaced tenants of the Imam’s debilitated
apartment buildings.
The Imam
just stated that all options are on the table. On Sunday,
September 12, he appeared on Christiane Amanpour’s show
“This Week.”
He said he would only make a decision about moving or
keeping the mosque at Park51 if it was for the good of
“everybody.”
Well Imam,
seize the moment and make history.
The
Imam can go on State Department-funded trips to the Middle
East and assure Muslims they got a good deal and they need
not attack American interests abroad. Similarly,
Donald Trump,
the billionaire real-estate magnate, can up his offer few
millions more and buy the entire NY site and turn it into an
acceptable tax-paying business that won’t desecrate the
memories of the 9/11 victims. He can turn the site into a
casino where scantily-clad waitresses would serve alcoholic
drinks to prod Wall Street stockbrokers into gambling money
– hopefully their own.
And for
once, New Jersey will get paid for being a dumping ground
for New York. Who said money cannot buy happiness?