Aref Assaf, "Sorry, You Cannot  Become a US Citizen! July 1 , 2007

Read the shortened version of the op-ed as published in the Bergen Record, July 5 ,2007

While the heated and polarized debate on the issue of illegal immigration intensifies, little is surfaced about those who face untold obstacles in their desire to legally become American citizens. Exuberant filings fees coupled with years of delays and bureaucratic entanglements at immigration and consular offices have led some to choose entry in residency in this country via illegal means.
Often illegal immigration is enveloped in violations of US laws, abuses of generous medical and housing assistance and impact on the US job market. However, legal immigration to the United States is unduly overburden by security concerns about the ethnicity and religious beliefs of those wishing to immigrate. Anti immigration pundits often concede that they are not against legal immigration whereby people apply for visa to immigrate to the U.S.
The fact remains that for thousands of Arabs and Muslims, this option is often not possible. Profiling as a means to enhance national security has been proven ineffective, discriminatory and encourages acts of hate. Current and proposed policy changes may lead to a frenzy competition between legal and illegal immigrants vying for the limited number of visas.

 We laud the efforts of Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) who unsuccessfully introduced an amendment  to the current immigrant bill to prioritize the issuance of visa favoring those who are here legally and want to become US citizens. In a press release, Menendez writes, “Here is another case for you to consider. You are a U.S. citizen and have paid your taxes, served your nation, attend your church, and make a good living. You have petitioned to have your adult child come to America, but did so after the arbitrary date of May 1, 2005. Under this bill, the U.S. citizen would lose that right. However, those who are undocumented in the country after that May 1, 2005 date actually get a benefit." Sadly the amendment was killed. We hope the Senator will continue to pursue this important issue now that the entire immigration bill was defeated. This will be the message we will deliver t to the Senator when we meet with him in August.

Various studies and reports by Arab and Muslim American groups such as the ADC, AAI, and CAIR have collectively argued that the government is illegally delaying the naturalization applications of immigrants by profiling individuals it perceives to be Muslim and subjecting them to an indefinite series of security checks. These reports sternly accuse the U.S. government of turning immigration institutions into security stations that penalize individuals because of their religion and national origin.

Undoubtedly, our country is facing serious immigration issues relating to illegal immigrants but the plight of Muslims and Arabs has to do with legal immigration procedures and requirements. Since 2001, immigration law has increasingly been used to target our community. In 2002, the government instituted the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS), which required non-citizen males from  mostly Muslim and Arab countries that were designated as threats to national security to formally register with the government. Strikingly but not unexpectedly not one of the 93,000 men “specially registered” was charged with a terrorism-related offense; instead the consequences of special registration were mass deportations and detention for minor or technical immigration violations. Discriminatory policies have also been implemented in visa applications and immigration raids.

Take the case of "Ahmad", a forty year old software engineer with a thriving software company and with no criminal record. Ahmad, like thousands of immigrants has chosen the United States as their new home: they abide by U.S. laws, pay U.S. taxes, and contribute to our nation’s economy and strengthen its multicultural foundations. "Ahmad" has also passed every test and fulfilled every requirement related to the naturalization process, but  he continues to wait for security clearance on his application. The only update on his four year long application is a demand for updated finger prints.

"MQ" is also  being denied permanent residency even though he is a leader of a major Islamic center in NJ and has often exemplified true citizenship qualities and voices of moderation- exactly the type of individuals we need in our midst. Sadly, caught between two worlds but unable to call either home, these individuals are living in limbo; they are treated as outsiders in their new home and are hindered in their ability to maintain ties with loved ones in their country of origin.

Delays and outright denials, have, subsequently encouraged  some Arabs and Muslims to illegally enter the US through the Mexican border or in some instances deliberately obtain a tourist visa with the full intention of never leaving the country. The delays have also created the cumulative effect of taxation without representation, disenfranchising a large segment of our community by preventing them from exercising their right to vote and more seriously gave credence to the perception of being unwelcome in their  adopted country. Fuller assimilation in the larger American society is thwarted as many in our community choose to cocoon themselves inside their geographic and ethnic enclaves.

It cannot be conclusively proven that these policies are purposefully or intentionally  discriminatory, in that they appear to be profiling individuals based on their name, race, religion, gender, or national origin. But it is our contention that prolonged security checks in the naturalization process have the effect of unfairly burdening  our community. Such policies, and their subsequent effects are illegal under international and existing US laws.

Profiling whether based on race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin is not only illegal and unconstitutional but it has been proven not to be a reliable substitute for credible intelligence gathering techniques to identify potential threats. It does not render our country safer. Profiling whether intentional or consequential  fosters suspicion and insecurity and, if not curbed,  it will  institutionalize discriminatory and prejudicial acts and attitudes.

As the government increasingly expands its focus on threats stemming from  “homegrown” terrorist sleeper cells (as in the case of the Ft. Dix Six) such scrutiny, and the resulting human rights violations may continue to worsen for the Arab and Muslim community. The resulting wounds will increasingly prove to be  self-inflicted. We hope that as politicians revisit the immigrate debate, they need to be reminded that any immigration reforms which punish legal immigrants are unfair and would seriously impact the values of our cherished democratic system.  End.

Related: In a recent piece I wrote about the shortsighted visa restriction policy of the United States government. I argued that a more liberal policy is needed to encourage more Arab and Muslim students to come here to further their studies. I also argued that business visas to Arabs and Muslims must be expanded to encourage greater trade and investments.

A recent 200-page report by MERIP argues that non-immigrant visa restrictions for Arabs have negatively hurt America’s economy, further alienated America’s friends in the region and above all did not serve our long term strategic interests. PDF Download (2 MB)

Here is  a link to a great article on the impact of official U.S. polices on Arab and Muslim Americans.

Click here to read the text of the Press Release issued by Sen. Menendez
Read a statement by Noel Salah who spoke before Congress on Immigration