Subject: Israeli Elections and the Prospects for Peace
in the Middle East.
As expected, Ariel Sharon was reelected Prime
Minster of Israel. The fact that Israel has
elections seems to give credence to the oft-repeated
claim of Israel being the "only democracy in the
Middle East". In reality, fully half of the people
living under Israeli rule have limited rights of
citizenship (the Arab citizens of Israel, who,
though they have the right to vote and run for
office but are discriminated against in just about
every realm of public life, sometimes even by law)
or no rights of citizenship (the people living under
occupation as well as the foreign workers who have
been brought in by the hundreds of thousands in
recent years to replace the Palestinians in the
cheap labor market).
However, it is fair to say that Israel has
democratic structures that are much more developed
than its Middle Eastern neighbors (thanks in no
small measure to Western support for totalitarian
regimes and the lingering effects of the colonial
era). But access to those structures is limited for
many and barred for many others. Yet, Israel must
confront the fundamental and inescapable truth: It
is impossible to be both occupiers and democrats;
there is no such thing as enlightened exploiters and
racists. Those are irreconcilable contradictions
and flagrant oxymorons. Israel's claims about its
democratic character are empty boasts.
Just as there is no such thing as a partial
pregnancy, there is no such thing as a partial
democracy, either.
The obstacles to Israeli democracy do not end
with the occupation, but they do begin there, and it
is the occupation that is the biggest obstacle. Once
the occupation ends, Israel can begin to build a
true democracy, with rights for all who live under
the rule of its law and government. Until then,
Ariel Sharon will not bring peace and security to
his people: neither to the minority who voted for
him nor the majority who couldn't.
Respectfully,
Aref Assaf,