|
More pro-Israel than AIPAC? March 12, 207
We just learned of a letter being circulated in the US
Senate to urge the US not to recognize the expected Palestinian unity
government. The "Dear colleague' letter was sent Senators Bill Nelson (D-FL) and
John Ensign (R-NV) to Secretary Rice. At a time when the U.S. should be
supporting forces of moderation among the Palestinians, this letter weakens
those forces and demonstrates to the Palestinian people that moderation brings
them nothing.
Moreover, this letter is in direct opposition to the wait-and-see approach taken
by Israel and the United States. Israeli Prime Minister Olmert met with
President Abbas on Sunday and plans to meet him again, and Secretary Rice is
actively trying to reinvigorate the peace process. This is not the time to shut
down critically needed diplomatic engagement however meager and unprincipled. We
n the American Arab forum have sent letters to our two Senators, Menendez and
Lautenberg urging them not to sign the letter.
There is one important point made in the letter: the
demand to recognize Israel's right to exist as against recognizing the State of
Israel. This is not simply a question of semantics or linguistic metaphor. I
invite you to read the serious implications and both moral and political
implications of such a distinction.
Click here to read more
Here is the text of the letter to Secretary Rice:
The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Secretary
United States Department of State
Dear Madame Secretary:
Securing peace in the Middle East between Israel and all of her neighbors has
been a long-term goal of the United States- long before and quite apart from the
current conflict in Iraq -- and we support your efforts to advance that
important goal.
We know how deeply the people of Israel long for peace, and we are mindful of
all the avenues successive Israeli governments have pursued to achieve it:
bilateral negotiations, multilateral negotiations, and unilateral actions.
Unfortunately, those efforts have yet to bring a lasting peace, largely because
there has been no viable Palestinian leader ready to negotiate an end to the
conflict who has the strength and conviction to compromise and then to implement
an agreement. This sad fact remains as true today as it has ever been.
That is why, as you seek to reinvigorate the peace process, we believe it
important to reinforce certain basic principles that have guided US Middle East
policy that we know you share. First among these basic principles is securing
the three very basic obligations put forward by the Quartet that the Palestinian
Authority must meet in order for it to receive direct aid from the international
community: recognition of Israel's right to exist, a renunciation of violence
and terror, and acceptance of previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements. So far,
as a result of the international community's firm unity on these obligations,
this policy has had a real impact, with pressure mounting on the Hamas led PA to
do what is necessary in order for international assistance to resume.
The pressure to form a Palestinian unity government is a manifestation of that
impact. We were deeply disappointed, however, that last month's Mecca agreement
negotiated between the leaders of Hamas and Fatah failed to meet or even address
the obligations of the Quartet. Statements by Hamas leaders since the agreement
was signed only reinforce that fact. While the agreements might have brought a
temporary peace between Hamas and Fatah, it had little to do with making peace
with Israel and ultimately does not serve the interests of the Palestinian
people.
We know that there are already some in the Quartet who are pressing for direct
aid to resume. That would be a huge step back from the peace process you seek to
invigorate. We urge you to continue to hold firm and insist that these very
basic international principles not change- no direct aid and no contacts with
any members of a Palestinian Authority that does not explicitly and
unequivocally recognize Israel's right to exist, renounce terror, and accept
previous agreements.
We know that these are principles that you helped develop and certainly share.
It is our strong hope that they remain central to your efforts and to those of
the Quartet as the process moves forward.
Sincerely,
Signed, Bill Nelson (D-FL) and John Ensign (R-NV)
|