|
Aref Assaf
The other side of memory: commemorating
the Palestinian Nakba
May 10, 2008,
See a
shorter version as published in the Record, May 11, 2008
The
sixtieth anniversary of the creation of the State of Israel does
not call for celebration but for an
honest assessment of how the manner in which the State was
created and its consequences. The creation of the State is the
single event that led to on-going hostility between Arabs and
Israelis, led to the instability of the Middle East region, a
humanitarian crisis, and the continuation of the conflict
between Israelis and Palestinians that literally worsens by the
hour sixty years later.
Every year, on May 15, we Palestinians commemorate the Nakba ("the
catastrophe"): the expulsion and dispossession of hundreds of
thousands Palestinians from their homes and land. In 1948 more
than 60 percent of the total Palestinian population was
expelled. More than 530 Palestinian villages were depopulated
and completely destroyed. To date, Israel has prevented the
return of approximately six million Palestinian refugees, who
have either been expelled or displaced. Approximately 250,000
internally displaced Palestinian second-class citizens of Israel
are prevented from returning to their homes and villages.
This year's anniversary is particularly somber for me. My father
passed away this past January after six decades of waiting to
return to his native village, Allar, west of Jerusalem, from
which he and his parents, were expelled in 1948. He so fondly
recalled his youthful life in the village and always dreamt of
returning even to be buried there. The memory of Palestine that
was my father's burden is now mine to shoulder, an inheritance to
leave for my children lest they forget from whence we all came.
My father's legacy also includes my inalienable right of return to
my homeland, Palestine that has been affirmed by the UN
Resolution 194 over 115 times since 1948.
"Refugees wishing to return to their homes and live
at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do
so at the earliest practical date. " UNGA resolution
194
The right of the Palestinian refugees and the
uprooted to return to their homes is a fundamental right under
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights among others. This right is an
inalienable right. This Right follows from the
sanctity of private ownership, which cannot be extinguished by
new sovereignty or occupation and has no expiration date It is according to this principle that the European
Jews claimed successfully the restitution of their lost property
in World War II, without the benefit of a single UN resolution.
The Right of Return is essentially my right as an
individual which cannot be delegated, reduced or
nullified by any representation on my behalf.
Most importantly, the Right of Return
is not substituted or affected in any way by the establishment
of a Palestinian state in any form. My Right of Return must be
recognized by Israel irrespective of my ability or desire to
exercise it or seek compensation thereof. Israel's moral,
political and physical salvation hinges on its readiness to
accept the full moral, political and financial obligations the
Catastrophe has brought unto the Palestinians.
One
of the most open secrets about Israel’s creation is its
deliberate and systematic use force to expel Palestinians off
their lands. In fact Jewish leaders
spoke openly of the need to use military clashes to expel as
many Palestinians as possible before other Arab countries could
come to their defense. The Haganah militia's
Plan Dalet was the blueprint for this ethnic cleansing.
Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion, said "We must
use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and
the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its
Arab population.
The Israeli historian Ilan Pappé
takes a new look at the expulsion of the Palestinians in 1948.
According to Pappé's new book,
"The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine"
, but an act of ethnic cleansing planned long in advance.
According to Pappé, the Palestinians'
exodus was not an unfortunate side-effect of the war, As in any case of
ethnic cleansing, whether in ex-Yugoslavia or elsewhere,
ideological and socioeconomic factors played a crucial role in
Palestine prior to the actual expulsion. Benny Morris outlined
this intellectual and economic context in a recent publication.
By contrast, Pappé concentrates on the logistical and operative
aspects of the expulsion. An important instrument was provided
by the so-called "village dossiers", files in which the Jewish
Agency and the Jewish National Fund had scrupulously documented
all Arab villages and their inhabitants beginning from the 1930s
onward.
As early as 1943 members of the Jewish intelligence service
announced that the catalogue was complete. In 1948, Pappé
claims, the dossiers were used to facilitate the evacuation of
Palestinian villages and to nip all resistance in the bud – in
part with target executions among Palestinian men.
Ilan Pappé provides a detailed description of the methods used
by members of the Israeli military in Arab towns between 1947
and 1949, often following the pattern of the so-called "Plan
Dalet": attack, taking of prisoners and in some cases the
killing of men, expulsion of the remaining inhabitants, the
plundering and subsequent destruction of the buildings and the
laying of mines in the rubble to prevent a return. Subsequently
the fleeing women and old people were often robbed of money and
jewelry as well.
It made no difference whether or not a village had taken part in
military actions. The goal was to create a majority Jewish
population in British Palestine (and after the foundation of the
state of Israel).
The diaries of high-ranking officers reveal that rapes seem to
have occurred on a regular basis during Jewish attacks on
Palestinians. In an especially egregious case a twelve-year-old
girl was kidnapped, raped for days by more than 20 soldiers, and
finally killed. This was one of the few cases in which the
soldiers involved were later sentenced by an Israeli court – to
a maximum of two years in jail. Many other cases came to light,
but were never investigated.
Sixty years later, Israel and Palestine are consumed in
violence. Innocent Palestinians and Israelis are both dying in
the conflict. The United States contributes to the violence by
providing military aid. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza spirals
out of control. The majority of Palestinians live in abject
poverty. Those populations remain vulnerable to extremist
organizations. Israel continues collective punishment of the
Palestinian population through the military occupation of
Palestinian lands. This collective punishment includes home
demolitions, expansion of illegal outposts and settlements,
barrier walls, blocked access to medical care, checkpoints, and
targeting of the civilian population by the Israeli Army.
Celebrating Israel’s creation on Arab lands, represents a
questionable morality that renders theses celebrations
unacceptable from any ethical perspective. First, they never
mention the terrible fact that Israel came into being and is
intrinsically linked to the dispossession of the indigenous Arab
population who now comprise the world’s oldest and largest
refugee population. This anniversary cannot be celebrated in a
vacuum, but at a moment during which Israel is one of the states
systematically violating the basic rules of international law,
humanitarian law, and human rights, as confirmed by the
International Court of Justice.
Israel's ongoing denial of Palestinian rights - and
unconditional U.S. financial and diplomatic support for Israel -
fuels anti-American sentiment abroad. Public opinion surveys
conducted in eight Arab countries have shown
that "the negative perception of the United States is based on
American policies, not a dislike of the West." The same polls
showed that "the Palestinian issue was listed by many Arabs
among the political issues that affect them most personally."
Resolution of the Palestinian refugee issue would undoubtedly
improve America's international image, by proving that the U.S.
government supports the consistent application of international
law.
The
United States Congress has
erred when it recently passed
a one-sided resolutions that failed to address the entirety of
what the creation of the State of Israel has meant to the very
people that live there -- Palestinians and Israelis. Instead,
the US should support a just and lasting peace between these
communities by encouraging dialogue, diplomacy and the efforts
of ordinary Israelis and Palestinians to seek peace and justice
with one another.
We are gravely concerned that President’ Bush’s upcoming visit to Israel
will again ignore the other side of Israel’s creation; the agony
of the Palestinian people, many of whom are now American
citizens. History stands to look back favorably at
President Bush should he use his visit to celebrate Israel's
creation by awakening Jewish conciseness to recognize
Palestinian suffering and concretely moving his vision of a
Palestinian state into reality. Closure of the Palestinian
suffering will hence commence.
On May 15, I will join fellow Palestinians who will
release 21,915 black balloons (one for every day of the last 60
years) into the sky from my former refugee camp, Kalandiya checkpoint and Bethlehem to
counter Israel’s celebrations and to remind the world of the
destruction and death Israel has brought upon the Palestinians
since then.
Related:
Palestine Right Of Return, Sacred, Legal, and Possible By Dr.
Salman Abu Sitta
|